Study Reveals Gaps in Electronic Health Record Accuracy

A recent study published in BMC Primary Care highlights concerning discrepancies between the conversations patients have with their primary care clinicians and the information recorded in their electronic health records (EHRs). The research, conducted at five Veterans Affairs clinics in the Midwest, reveals that many patient-initiated concerns are omitted from EHRs, while irrelevant details are sometimes included.

Here’s your invitation to participate in running research with RunDot

Qualified participants receive 2 free months of run training.

The RunDot Project is an annual research initiative that provides optimized run training to help runners reach their true performance potential.

The project also quantifies the performance gains that RunDot's Optimized Training delivers.

What kind of results can you expect?

RunDot athletes improve their running performance an average of 3.2x more than non-users. They also see positive changes in 30% less training time.

Participation simply requires following your prescribed RunDot training to the best of your abilities.

You qualify for FREE training if you meet these criteria:

• You run with a GPS-enabled device

• You have not used RunDot (or TriDot) in the last year

• You are not a professional runner

• You are enthusiastic about achieving your running goals!

Get in shape with two free months of running training! Fill out the 3-minute application here to find out if you qualify

In this observational study, researchers compared audio recordings of primary care visits with the EHR notes. They found that patient concerns discussed during appointments were often left out of the records. Specifically, while 92% of issues raised by clinicians were documented in the EHR, only 45% of patient-initiated topics were recorded. Alarmingly, almost half of the EHR notes contained information not mentioned in the actual consultation.

This gap in documentation can have serious consequences for patient care, as it may lead to incomplete or inaccurate medical records, affecting diagnosis, treatment, and overall patient outcomes. Dr. Michael Weiner, the study's lead author, emphasized that EHRs should accurately capture the full scope of patient visits, including both physical and psychosocial concerns, to ensure comprehensive care. He explained that clinicians need to properly interpret and document both patient statements and clinical findings to guide treatment effectively.

The study also suggests several factors contributing to the discrepancies, including clinician time constraints, lack of recognition of a patient's concerns, or even simple forgetfulness. In some cases, clinicians may believe an issue has been addressed in previous visits, leading to omission. To improve accuracy, researchers suggest that EHRs should be updated as soon as possible after the visit, ensuring that important details are captured while still fresh in the clinician's mind.

The study’s senior author, Dr. Richard Frankel, pointed out the growing importance of EHRs in ensuring continuity of care, especially as face-to-face communication between clinicians is increasingly replaced by digital methods. He argued that aligning what’s discussed during appointments with what’s documented in the EHR is crucial for both the quality of care and addressing the patient’s full range of needs—biological, psychological, and social.

In conclusion, this study calls for better training and awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the importance of accurate EHR documentation. The findings reveal that current practices may compromise patient care, and improving EHR accuracy could have a significant impact on health outcomes.