Health Systems Slash Administrative Jobs: Why the Cuts Are Happening Now

In partnership with

Across the United States, hospitals and health systems are trimming hundreds of administrative jobs in 2025, a trend that’s raising eyebrows and rattling workforces. From Cleveland Clinic to Corewell Health in Michigan, major players are shedding roles in IT, finance, human resources, and billing—positions that don’t directly touch patients but keep the healthcare machine humming. The cuts, often numbering in the dozens or low hundreds per system, aren’t isolated incidents; they’re part of a seismic shift driven by financial pressures, technological disruption, and a post-pandemic reckoning. So, why are health systems hitting the brakes on administrative staff, and what does it mean for the future of healthcare?

Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Subscribe to 1440 today.

The Money Crunch: Margins Under Siege

The simplest answer lies in the balance sheets. Healthcare isn’t cheap, and for many systems, the numbers aren’t adding up. Inflation has jacked up costs—think supplies, utilities, and wages—while reimbursements from Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers lag behind. Take Main Line Health in Pennsylvania: in January 2025, it axed about 200 administrative and management jobs after reporting a 1.5% operating margin for fiscal year 2024, a razor-thin buffer compared to the 3% to 4% many systems aim for. Cleveland Clinic, meanwhile, saw its operating income drop nearly 70% in 2023 from the year before, prompting a wave of cuts in early 2025 targeting non-clinical roles.

The financial strain isn’t new, but it’s intensified. The pandemic’s end didn’t bring relief—hospitals are still clawing back from lost elective procedure revenue, while labor shortages have forced higher pay to retain nurses and doctors. Administrative staff, often seen as less essential to patient care, become the low-hanging fruit when budgets tighten. “We’re in a challenging economic environment for healthcare,” Corewell Health said in February 2025, confirming cuts to non-patient-facing roles after a modest 2.1% operating margin mid-2024. For systems like these, every dollar saved counts.

Tech Takeover: Automation and Outsourcing

Then there’s technology—both a savior and a disruptor. Health systems are leaning hard into automation and artificial intelligence to streamline back-office tasks. Billing, coding, and scheduling—once the domain of human admins—are increasingly handled by software or outsourced overseas. Corewell Health, for instance, reportedly shifted some medical coding and billing work to international teams in early 2025, slashing around 190 remote jobs in Michigan. Posts on platforms like Reddit buzzed with frustration from affected workers, many of whom saw their roles vanish to cheaper labor pools abroad.

AI isn’t just cutting costs—it’s cutting headcounts. Electronic health record systems, like those from Epic, now use algorithms to flag billing errors or optimize staff schedules, reducing the need for human oversight. A 2024 study from the American Hospital Association noted that health systems adopting advanced tech saw administrative expenses drop by up to 15%. For cash-strapped hospitals, that’s a compelling case to pare down staff in favor of machines or offshore vendors.

Post-Pandemic Pivot: Refocusing on the Frontline

The pandemic laid bare a stark truth: patient care trumps paperwork. As health systems reevaluate priorities, they’re redirecting resources to clinical staff—nurses, doctors, therapists—who directly impact outcomes. Baystate Health in Massachusetts cut 98 corporate jobs in early 2025, less than 1% of its workforce, as part of a $225 million “transformation effort” to bolster core operations. Similarly, Mass General Brigham, facing a $250 million budget gap, consolidated management and administrative roles to safeguard patient-facing services.

This shift reflects a broader mindset: administrative bloat is a luxury few can afford. Health systems bloated with middle managers and support staff during the pre-COVID boom years are now streamlining. “We’re aligning our structure with key objectives,” Penn Medicine’s CEO Kevin Mahoney wrote in a 2023 memo after cutting admin roles—a sentiment echoing across the industry in 2025. The goal? Keep the focus on bedsides, not boardrooms.

The Policy Wildcard: Trump-Era Restructuring

Adding fuel to the fire is a new federal push to “streamline” government, rippling into healthcare. The Trump administration, back in power as of January 2025, has targeted federal health agencies like the CDC, NIH, and FDA, firing over 2,500 probationary employees by mid-February—many in administrative roles. Health and Human Services (HHS) framed it as part of a broader effort to “better serve the American people at the highest and most efficient standard.” While private health systems aren’t directly under HHS’s thumb, the rhetoric of efficiency and cost-cutting has trickled down, emboldening hospital execs to wield the ax.

Some speculate this aligns with Project 2025, a conservative blueprint to shrink federal bureaucracy, which could slash up to a million government jobs if fully enacted. Though hospitals aren’t federal agencies, they’re feeling the same pressure to justify every desk job amid scrutiny from insurers, regulators, and taxpayers.

The Human Cost—and What’s Next

For the workers caught in the crosshairs, it’s a gut punch. “I was told my role was ‘no longer aligned’—after 10 years,” one ex-Main Line Health employee posted anonymously online. Many systems, like Corewell and Baystate, insist they’re helping laid-off staff find new roles internally or offering severance, but the transition stings. Remote workers, especially in billing and IT, seem particularly vulnerable as outsourcing accelerates.

What’s the bigger picture? Health systems say these cuts ensure long-term survival, preserving care quality amid economic headwinds. Critics, though, worry it’s shortsighted—fewer admins could mean more chaos in billing, scheduling, or compliance, burdening clinicians already stretched thin. Dental groups in Utah, for instance, predict a $48 million cost spike from a fluoride ban due to administrative gaps; similar ripple effects could hit hospitals if back-office support evaporates.

As 2025 unfolds, the trend shows no signs of slowing. With margins tight, tech advancing, and policy pushing efficiency, administrative jobs remain on the chopping block. For health systems, it’s a high-stakes gamble: cut fat to stay lean—or risk cutting muscle and hobbling the mission. Only time will tell if the math adds up—or if patients and staff pay the price.